
Gentle reader, here is my humble attempt to explain why I sided with the majority of cheftestants in their dislike of Marcel. Having reviewed a few tapes, I have softened my stance toward this ambitious young chef...just a smidge.
Marcel threw down his gauntlet from the start
In this video of Episode One, Marcel declares that he came to win the competition, not make friends. True to his word, Marcel kept himself at a distance. In last Wednesday's episode, Marcel repeated this statement to the judges in front of Ilan and Betty, confirming what the other cheftestants already knew.
6 comments:
Your quote about passive-aggressive people is spot-on. The shit-eating grin Marcel gets whenever one of the others pays him negative attention is telling. He's so the guy that knowingly pushes everyone's buttons, then gets all wide-eyed, "What did I do?" to get sympathy when someone finally snaps on him.
But Sam's outburst was definitely a better way to deal than Ilan's behavior. Yes, he flipped out, but confined it to a short period of time instead of dwelling and letting Marcel get into his head to affect his dish for the challenge. Ilan on the other hand did. There was even that clip from the episode where Ilan's asking if the guests are saying bad things about Marcel's dish, and Sam tells him to work on his OWN dish. It's probably at least partly a maturity and experience issue; perhaps Ilan will learn to deal with similar situations better in the future. He IS young, after all. Funnily enough, though tons of Marcel defenders throw out the "He's young!" excuse, they don't bother to do the same for Ilan -- even though Ilan's 2 years younger! This may be because Marcel visually appears to be about 16 while Ilan actually looks his age, though.
But the editing itself is a nobrainer. It's freaking Bravo -- the king of manipulative, transparent editing. Remember the PR 1 finale, when Kara Saun magically transformed from the totally nice, professional and all-around awesome woman she was the entire season to a mean cheating bitch who wanted to bend the budget rules? It was ridiculous, as if this complete about-face were supposed to justify Jay's win after Kara's season of dominance. I liked both of them, but hated how Bravo made Kara out to be such a bad guy just to prop up Jay as their winner.
The TC editing is similarly over-the-top. The first half of the season, you could've painted halos over golden boys Sam, Cliff and Ilan...now they're the mean awful boys picking on Poor Little Marcel! Come on now, the truth is obviously somewhere in the middle. Nobody is that one-dimensional or either good or bad. Marcel probably ends up making the Final 4 or something, hence his redemption arc, as there's no way his actual dishes could possibly justify his getting further than someone like Cliff. On the other hand, odds are at least one out of Cliff, Ilan or Sam is going to get cut before Final 4, so now the show is cramming their bad sides and less attractive qualities down our throats -- so viewers won't feel they were "robbed" even though they've been frontrunners practically the whole run. Bravo editing is just so freaking obvious that way.
Anyway, sorry for the length! I did obviously enjoy your Marcel analysis, as it sparked me to practically write my own essay on the subject in response :)
Thank you for your kind comment. I had forgotten that Ilan was 2 yrs. younger than Marcel. You made an excellent point!
You also have to take into account the TIMING of a lot of the behavior we have seen, and mitigating factors. For example... Before even the first challenge, the first stressful situation, and the first sleepless night, Marcel SINGLED HIMSELF out as the lone asshole. Now he's whining that he got EXACTLY what he set out for... WTF???
My mama always taught me that first impressions are crucial, and I think Marcel underestimated that. He doesn't have the time or the social decorun to correct people's assumptions about him. And why should they? Marcel is an annoying and immature prick, regardless of what the others are.
At least with Sam Ilan and Betty, I can attribute some of their not-so-nice behavior to sleeplessness and general stress level. Also, being thrown in a situation with someone as irritating as Marcel cannot possibly bring out the best in you, as was probably part of Marcel's strategy all along.
At the end of the day though, it comes down to this... You can't be a Top Chef if you cannot inspire those under you. The only thing I have seen Marcel insipre anyone to is violence, verbal or otherwise...
Also, it has to be said that if you go back to episode one... he made it very clear to the audience AS WELL AS TO HIS FELLOW CONTESTANTS that he was not here to make friends and he didnt care what anyone thought of him, and even went so far as to make snide provocatory remarks. Now he is reaping what he has sown. It's a bitch, ain't it??
wow...i completely disagree!
Now we come to the heart of the matter, Anon. Marcel is an accomplice in his own demise.
He's not as innocent as some folks would have him be; nor is he a villain. He is young and he makes mistakes, but he has huge personality flaws. (Yes, he is passive/aggressive.) But Tom Colicchio is right: Something about Marcel's personality turns people into monsters. These people should have behaved like grown-ups, but they didn't.
Let's just call it a draw.
Thanks ms. place for the indepth, fair and balanced view and for quoting me twice. I agree, from how little we see (edits), it's a draw so far. But this week we might see the game played out differently. Love this site. posted on 10:20pm 1/15/07
Post a Comment