Oh, but I bet it shocked you!
It's definitely not pleasing to look at.
Yuck. But that is the point, isn't it?
The "artist" should have also included Charlie Manson in it, THEN it would have been shocking.It's just unpleasant, and reaffirms that Marilyn Manson has nothing I am interested in.
I'm scared, Mommy...
well, now that I can access your site, I kinda wish I couldn't now that I've seen this. My vote, is no, it isn't art. Art to shock without point is icky. (my professional opinion - icky!)I agree j.d. - I'm scared, Mommy!
uummm... no. i think that was pretty obvoius
Post a Comment
7 comments:
Oh, but I bet it shocked you!
It's definitely not pleasing to look at.
Yuck. But that is the point, isn't it?
The "artist" should have also included Charlie Manson in it, THEN it would have been shocking.
It's just unpleasant, and reaffirms that Marilyn Manson has nothing I am interested in.
I'm scared, Mommy...
well, now that I can access your site, I kinda wish I couldn't now that I've seen this. My vote, is no, it isn't art. Art to shock without point is icky. (my professional opinion - icky!)
I agree j.d. - I'm scared, Mommy!
uummm... no. i think that was pretty obvoius
Post a Comment